WHO: No evidence recovered COVID-19 people having antibodies are protected from a second infection

coronavirus-blue

By SAT Newsdesk

MELBOURNE, 25 April 2020: The World Health Organisation (WHO) says, “There is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection.” The WHO explanation comes after some governments suggested the detection of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, could serve as the basis for an “immunity passport” or “risk-free certificate” that would enable individuals to travel or to return to work assuming that they are protected against re-infection.

A ‘Scientific Brief'(24 April 2020) emailed to SAT on 25 April 2020 says, “The development of immunity to a pathogen through natural infection is a multi-step process that typically takes place over 1-2 weeks. The body responds to a viral infection immediately with a non-specific innate response in which macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells slow the progress of virus and may even prevent it from causing symptoms. This non-specific response is followed by an adaptive response where the body makes antibodies that specifically bind to the virus. These antibodies are proteins called immunoglobulins. The body also makes T-cells that recognize and eliminate other cells infected with the virus.

This is called cellular immunity. This combined adaptive response may clear the virus from the body, and if the response is strong enough, may prevent progression to severe illness or re-infection by the same virus. This process is often measured by the presence of antibodies in the blood.”

It also says, ” Laboratory tests that detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in people, including rapid immunodiagnostic tests, need further validation to determine their accuracy and reliability. Inaccurate immunodiagnostic tests may falsely categorize people in two ways. The first is that they may falsely label people who have been infected as negative, and the second is that people who have not been infected are falsely labelled as positive. Both errors have serious consequences and will affect control efforts. These tests also need to accurately distinguish between past infections from SARS-CoV-2 and those caused by the known set of six human coronaviruses. Four of these viruses cause the common cold and circulate widely. The remaining two are the viruses that cause Middle East Respiratory Syndrome and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. People infected by any one of these viruses may produce antibodies that cross-react with antibodies produced in response to infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Advertisement

At this point in the pandemic, there is not enough evidence about the effectiveness of antibody-mediated immunity to guarantee the accuracy of an “immunity passport” or “risk-free certificate.” People who assume that they are immune to a second infection because they have received a positive test result may ignore public health advice. The use of such certificates may therefore increase the risks of continued transmission. As new evidence becomes available, WHO will update this scientific brief.”

LINK to the Scientific Brief – https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/immunity-passports-in-the-context-of-covid-19

16336526731883929
Neeraj Nanda

Share to

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on email
Tags

Get our Newsletter and e-Paper

Related Articles

Vinayak Kolape leads Wyndham Holi Festival of color into the 10th year

Vinayak Kolape leads Wyndham Holi Festival of color into the 10th year

Disparity plagues Victorian Indians in industry & politics: AII survey

Disparity plagues Victorian Indians in industry & politics: AII survey

After Nepal, Pashupatinath Temple soon in Melbourne

After Nepal, Pashupatinath Temple soon in Melbourne